Naturopathy debunked

Because of the volume of responses I've received on a previous message regarding Naturopathy, I thought it best to answer them all in a single post, instead of repeating the same information several times. I apologize if I sound a bit strident, but this is something of a pet peeve of mine. The vast majority of Naturopaths are quacks, even if well-meaning, who so far more harm than good (well-intentioned, perhaps, but we all know which road is paved with good intentions).
( Lots more detailed information here )

For more information, I strongly recommend the following sites. Especially the information on "confirmation bias", "pragmatic fallacy", "regressive fallacy", and "post hoc fallacy".

The Skeptic's Dictionary
Quackwatch